Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 619 | Thanked: 100 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#1
I've heard this before.. can anyone confirm this?
What I've heard is basically that's it's a highly modified version of linux. Wondering if that's true.
________
Avandia heart attack

Last edited by nax3000; 2011-03-18 at 12:56.
 
b-man's Avatar
Posts: 549 | Thanked: 502 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Bowling Green Ohio (united states)
#2
Mac OSX and Iphone OS run on the XNU kernel, which is a mix of the mach microkernel and the BSD monolithic kernel.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XNU
__________________
I'm an advanced user and a bit of a modder.
----------------------------------------------
I am involved with Mer, Deblet, and NITdroid.
My ports/creations/hacks: GNOME (for Deblet), Cdeb2», Ubuntu, playable flash games in the "Get Started" app, DBS, ect...


enhanced fedora port has been canceled in favor of NITDebian (TBA)

Last edited by b-man; 2010-05-03 at 03:39.
 
Posts: 11 | Thanked: 5 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#3
Mac OS X and the iPhone OS are Darwin underneath, which is based on BSD and NeXTSTEP. They're both Unix-like systems, so they do have some things in common, but Linux doesn't share any code with Darwin/BSD.
 
mrebanza's Avatar
Posts: 290 | Thanked: 132 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ New York City
#4
but LINUX was based on UNIX as an open source and free alternative . . . UNIX is basically a commercial version of Linux . . .
Originally Posted by Wikipedia View Post
A Linux-based system is a modular Unix-like operating system. It derives much of its basic design from principles established in Unix during the 1970s and 1980s. Such a system uses a monolithic kernel, the Linux kernel, which handles process control, networking, and peripheral and file system access. Device drivers are either integrated directly with the kernel or added as modules loaded while the system is running.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux

Last edited by mrebanza; 2010-05-03 at 04:39.
 
Posts: 87 | Thanked: 47 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Sorocaba, Brasil
#5
Originally Posted by mrebanza View Post
but LINUX was based on UNIX as an open source and free alternative . . . UNIX is basically a commercial version of Linux . . .
No, you are wrong. Indeed, your quote of wikipedia says nothing about UNIX being a commercial version o Linux. It says "unix-like".

In fact, Linux means "Linux is not Unix".

UNIX is not really an operating system: It could better be understood as a set of tools which names, options and behaviours must be respected in order for an Operating System being called of Unix flavour.

Solaris is a Unix flavour, BSD is a Unix flavour, MacOS X is a Unix flavour, SCO is/was a Unix flavour.

Linux+GNU tools is not a Unix flavour, as it has never been certified as so. It's more of an "emulator" that tries to be compliant to Unix but without being Unix.
 
Posts: 27 | Thanked: 18 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#6
Originally Posted by dalonso View Post
No, you are wrong. Indeed, your quote of wikipedia says nothing about UNIX being a commercial version o Linux. It says "unix-like".

In fact, Linux means "Linux is not Unix".

UNIX is not really an operating system: It could better be understood as a set of tools which names, options and behaviours must be respected in order for an Operating System being called of Unix flavour.

Solaris is a Unix flavour, BSD is a Unix flavour, MacOS X is a Unix flavour, SCO is/was a Unix flavour.

Linux+GNU tools is not a Unix flavour, as it has never been certified as so. It's more of an "emulator" that tries to be compliant to Unix but without being Unix.
Linus Torvalds wanted to call the kernel he developed Freax (a combination of "free",and the letter X to indicate that it is a Unix-like system). Ari Lemmke, who administered the FTP server where the kernel was first hosted for downloading, named Torvalds' directory Linux.
 
Posts: 3,841 | Thanked: 1,079 times | Joined on Nov 2006
#7
Originally Posted by dalonso View Post
Linux+GNU tools is not a Unix flavour, as it has never been certified as so. It's more of an "emulator" that tries to be compliant to Unix but without being Unix.
Actually it was certified as a Unix flavour, at one point. It was done by SuSE I believe, many years ago (around 2.0 IIRC). Against SUSV2 I think. And also against POSIX.1 around the same time.
These certifications don't automatically keep up with new versions though, so it would have to be re-certified for later versions and I don't think that did happen.
__________________
N800/OS2007|N900/Maemo5
-- Metalayer-crawler delenda est.
-- Current state: Fed up with everything MeeGo.
 
Posts: 50 | Thanked: 28 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#8
 
Posts: 3,428 | Thanked: 2,856 times | Joined on Jul 2008
#9
Originally Posted by h3llraz0r View Post
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCwN4Vk_vi4
ROFL...

"We're good, you're not."
"We get laid, and you don't."
__________________
If I've helped you or you use any of my packages feel free to help me out.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maintaining:
pyRadio - Pandora Radio on your N900, N810 or N800!
 
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#10
Originally Posted by dalonso View Post
No, you are wrong. Indeed, your quote of wikipedia says nothing about UNIX being a commercial version o Linux. It says "unix-like".

In fact, Linux means "Linux is not Unix".

UNIX is not really an operating system: It could better be understood as a set of tools which names, options and behaviours must be respected in order for an Operating System being called of Unix flavour.

Solaris is a Unix flavour, BSD is a Unix flavour, MacOS X is a Unix flavour, SCO is/was a Unix flavour.

Linux+GNU tools is not a Unix flavour, as it has never been certified as so. It's more of an "emulator" that tries to be compliant to Unix but without being Unix.
YOU are wrong and shouldn't correct people when you don't know what the F you're talking about.

1.) Linux DOES NOT mean "Linux is not Unix", the word Linux is derived from a combination of UNIX and it's inventors first name: Linus.

2.) UNIX absolutely is an Operating System in and of itself, the original UNIX Operating System was called exactly that, "UNIX". The fact that there are many variations doesn't nullify the existence of the original.

3.) MacOS X is as much a "Unix flavour" as Windows is, it is the latest version of an object oriented piece of crap operating system that was originally called NeXTSTEP. The only similarities it has to an actual Linux/UNIX distribution are the various pieces of code that Steve Jobs stole from FreeBSD.

4.) "Linux+GNU tools is not a Unix flavour, as it has never been certified as so. It's more of an "emulator" that tries to be compliant to Unix but without being Unix." Wow, I honestly think reading this just made me dumber, my brain is throwing a fit trying to add up the number of ways this statement is flat out idiotic. Keep your verbal diarrhea to yourself or go correct people on sesamestreet.com where you may actually have a chance of finding someone who knows less than you do.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:59.