Poll: Delet the values from the speedpatch?
Poll Options
Delet the values from the speedpatch?

Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 856 | Thanked: 1,681 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Aleppo ,Syria
#2791
Originally Posted by willi6868 View Post
To which freq can I overlock my kernel if I'm using batterypatch?
you can overclock as much as you want
but if you want to overclock more than 900mhz then disable vdd1 before ! (with KPV49)

Originally Posted by maximilian1st View Post
Thank you so much karam, the N900 is another phone with your speedpatch and above all the battery patch.
you are welcomed

Originally Posted by AxelDominatoR View Post
Hello! I was installing the battery patch by hand (because my N900 is overly-customized) and noticed something.

In the postinst script you have:

Code:
if [ -f /etc/speedpatch ]; then
mv /opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_sleep_speedpatch /opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_sleep 
fi
but no /etc/speedpatch exists. The speedpatch, if I'm correct, is installed in /etc/event.d/speedpatch. This means the cpu_sleep_speedpatch is not installed even if speedpatch is indeed installed.

Can you confirm this?
Thanks a lot for your great work
oh ***** haven't noticed that
i will fix that right away
thank you for warning me

it's job is to renice tasks (if speedpatch installed then /dev/cgroup)
if not (then from /sysparts)

although it's not very important and effective as other configs

Last edited by karam; 2011-12-07 at 20:20.
 
Posts: 6 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Dec 2011
#2792
Originally Posted by BrX View Post
In xterm:

Code:
sudo gainroot
apt-get update
apt-get install leafpad
or just
Code:
nano /etc/powervr.d/hildon-desktop.ini
tQ man u r the best!!!!
 
Posts: 29 | Thanked: 11 times | Joined on Apr 2011 @ Slovakia, Bratislava
#2793
Thanks for this awesome improvements. I tried only speedpatch because I don't want that things about auto underclocking in batterypatch. After install and twice reboot there was significant difference in speed(it was much faster of course) especially when switching windows in microB. However, after some days I got in x-terminal those errors desribed in post #2749. My n900 slowed down, too. Then I tried just reinstalling speedpatch and rebooting the device once and problem vanished from x-terminal, it also sped up again.
 
carbonjha's Avatar
Posts: 83 | Thanked: 71 times | Joined on Jul 2011 @ Dhaka
#2794
@karam
I found some linux governor tweaking tips in this website. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/li...req-3/?ca=drs-

Its a very long and detail guide with lots of comparing graphs. I couldn't read the full guide. But it concludes with tweaking the conservative governor's up & down threshold which seems to have a significant effect on battery saving.

"overclock" profile of batterypatch uses conservative governor. I wasn't using it for a while because I changed it to ondemand. But today I thought about giving it a try. Then I find that first time the conservative governor loads with its default parameters ignoring the "overclock" profile & always remains that way.
Code:
up_threshold = 80
down_threshold = 20
freq_step = 5
ignore_nice_load = 0
sampling_down_factor = 1 
sampling_rate = 3000000
sampling_rate_max = 1500000000
sampling_min = 1500000
now Im testing these tweaks
Code:
echo 98 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/conservative/up_threshold

echo 95 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/conservative/down_threshold


echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/conservative/ignore_nice_load
underclock profile uses ondemand governor and it loads ok. so no need to change that. Lets hope it works well.
__________________
kernel-power v52
N900 rocks
http://n900world.blogspot.com/
 

The Following User Says Thank You to carbonjha For This Useful Post:
Posts: 856 | Thanked: 1,681 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Aleppo ,Syria
#2795
this seems to be very exciting
it should give a huge improvements
testing them too

btw you can add

echo 1500000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/conserva
tive/sampling_rate

and i will release a new package batterypatch-testing
including all the untested tweaks
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to karam For This Useful Post:
Posts: 856 | Thanked: 1,681 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Aleppo ,Syria
#2796
EVERYONE
i have released a new HUGE update

many many changes and new features
in short ... the continues time of usage must be at least doubled !!

PS: changed MAXFREQ to 900

tested the codes given by carbonjha no problems appeared
tested with HD record/watch and everything works fine

PS2: this might be the last update for 5 months except fixing bugs
have some studies to finish

/karam


//EDIT :
please report if any problems happens with you

Last edited by karam; 2011-12-08 at 22:54.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to karam For This Useful Post:
Posts: 336 | Thanked: 129 times | Joined on Jan 2011 @ portugal
#2797
doubled?...hm..i have to ckeck this out...
 
abhirajsoni's Avatar
Posts: 201 | Thanked: 63 times | Joined on Aug 2010 @ india
#2798
yes .. the lastest update surely got huge improvements. but in my case the touch vibration is harder now and the response is little late.
 
Posts: 856 | Thanked: 1,681 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Aleppo ,Syria
#2799
well try to increase the minfreq in overclock from 250 to 500
perhaps this solves your problem

although i have the vibration acts normally

//edit

how to :

install any text editor ex: leafpad

then
Code:
sudo gainroot
leafpad /usr/share/kernel-power-settings/overclock
and change MINFREQ=250 to MINFREQ=500

save and exit
PS: no need to reboot

Last edited by karam; 2011-12-09 at 13:04.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to karam For This Useful Post:
abhirajsoni's Avatar
Posts: 201 | Thanked: 63 times | Joined on Aug 2010 @ india
#2800
and how will i do that. sorry but i don't know about that.
 
Reply

Tags
autobrick, awesome-script, do no install, f***epitaph, install it now, perfect_ n900, script-a-brick, very safe


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:29.