Active Topics
-
How many of you still use N900 as main phone? (595)
to Community by deutch1976 - 1 day, 12 hrs ago -
Big news (7)
to OS2008 / Maemo 4 / Chinook - Diablo by endsormeans - 2 days, 20 hrs ago -
Firefox with Leste (8)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by endsormeans - 2 days, 21 hrs ago -
Which is the best N95? What software modifications could be made to it? (3)
to General by Kalatti - 5 days, 21 hrs ago -
Installing CSSU Stable in year 2024 (2)
to Maemo 5 / Fremantle by teroyk - 6 days, 4 hrs ago -
Porting apps to Leste (34)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Arno_11 - 6 days, 14 hrs ago - more...
jacktanner |
2012-01-15
, 06:15
|
|
Posts: 228 |
Thanked: 145 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#11
|
This is really fantastic. What would it take to get your package into Extras? I'm only really interested in the stable releases.
| The Following User Says Thank You to jacktanner For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-01-15
, 11:29
|
|
Posts: 1,397 |
Thanked: 2,126 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Dublin, Ireland
|
#12
|
Would you upload stable version to Extras? This way anyone who had already installed from Ovi would see the update (not everyone is continuosly checking TMO).
Once stable had reached Extras, you could also upload nightly to Devel.
Once stable had reached Extras, you could also upload nightly to Devel.
|
|
2012-01-15
, 11:33
|
|
Posts: 856 |
Thanked: 1,681 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Aleppo ,Syria
|
#13
|
yes it can be uploaded to devel
but don't use fennec (as a package name) so no conflicts happens with other repositories
use for ex : fennec-night
or fennec-devel
or pick up something from your mind
but don't use fennec (as a package name) so no conflicts happens with other repositories
use for ex : fennec-night
or fennec-devel
or pick up something from your mind
__________________
My Projects:
Speed Patch & Battery patch
Task-Swapper
Wifi-Pwner (MDK3 GUI)
Hacking Tools
Tutorials
How To Increase Camera Image Quality
How To Unblock Repositories In Forbidden Countries [Like Mine]
My Projects:
Speed Patch & Battery patch
Task-Swapper
Wifi-Pwner (MDK3 GUI)
Hacking Tools
Tutorials
How To Increase Camera Image Quality
How To Unblock Repositories In Forbidden Countries [Like Mine]
 |
|
2012-01-15
, 13:52
|
|
Posts: 1,195 |
Thanked: 2,708 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Hanoi
|
#14
|
Nightly works, many thanks. It is in deed quicker than previous versions.
For those interested: the No Script Anywhere (NSA) plugin works as well.
But you need to surf to the plug in webpage to D/L and install.
No Adblock yet.
For those interested: the No Script Anywhere (NSA) plugin works as well.
But you need to surf to the plug in webpage to D/L and install.
No Adblock yet.
|
|
2012-01-15
, 16:22
|
|
Posts: 1,397 |
Thanked: 2,126 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Dublin, Ireland
|
#15
|
Originally Posted by karam
Actually, I think exactly the opposite. One of the purposes of the repositories is precisely to be able to seamlessly upgrade the applications. Packaging first the stable version of Firefox would give all users the ability to easy upgrade the version from OVI.
yes it can be uploaded to devel
but don't use fennec (as a package name) so no conflicts happens with other repositories
use for ex : fennec-night
or fennec-devel
or pick up something from your mind
| The Following User Says Thank You to ivgalvez For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-01-15
, 19:18
|
|
Posts: 176 |
Thanked: 262 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Texas, USA
|
#16
|
Originally Posted by ste-phan
Use Adblock nightly to have Adblock.
No Adblock yet.
As far as putting it in Extras, I will need to do more research on the branding. I am not sure I can upload this as "Fennec" with the Mozilla art work, but I am not changing any of the source, so maybe I can.
| The Following User Says Thank You to mooninite For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-01-15
, 20:15
|
|
Posts: 154 |
Thanked: 110 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
|
#17
|
here's a guide to building the qt version which has always been faster
http://developer.mikek.dk/#post50
one thing i'm very interested in is html5 video. fennec on the n900 seems to be the only version/platform which allows gstreamer as a backend, which means we can play h264 or webm html5 videos and not care who wins the webm/h264 format war.
but to enable gstreamer support you need this line:
ac_add_options --enable-gstreamer
in your mozconfig file before compiling.
http://developer.mikek.dk/#post50
one thing i'm very interested in is html5 video. fennec on the n900 seems to be the only version/platform which allows gstreamer as a backend, which means we can play h264 or webm html5 videos and not care who wins the webm/h264 format war.
but to enable gstreamer support you need this line:
ac_add_options --enable-gstreamer
in your mozconfig file before compiling.
| The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to marbleuser For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-01-15
, 21:19
|
|
Posts: 154 |
Thanked: 110 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
|
#18
|
i've just installed this nightly 12a, and indeed it's slower than the qt version i have (10a), also it hasn't been compiled to use the gstreamer back end, as all the h264 html5 videos on this test page don't play
http://shapeshed.com/examples/HTML5-video-element/
what are the chances we could get a gstreamer enabled qt version compiled?
http://shapeshed.com/examples/HTML5-video-element/
what are the chances we could get a gstreamer enabled qt version compiled?
| The Following User Says Thank You to marbleuser For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-01-16
, 00:47
|
|
Posts: 176 |
Thanked: 262 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Texas, USA
|
#19
|
I never saw a performance difference between GTK and Qt builds so I think any opinion on the matter is purely subjective.
In regards to a binary build, I tried one and it failed to link properly. I won't be spending time on correcting it, but you're more than able to try yourself.
In regards to a binary build, I tried one and it failed to link properly. I won't be spending time on correcting it, but you're more than able to try yourself.
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mooninite For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-01-16
, 10:58
|
|
Posts: 154 |
Thanked: 110 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
|
#20
|
Originally Posted by mooninite
Well, i'd give up any percieved qt performance for a gtk version with gstreamer baked in. Do you have any plans for such a build?
I never saw a performance difference between GTK and Qt builds so I think any opinion on the matter is purely subjective.
In regards to a binary build, I tried one and it failed to link properly. I won't be spending time on correcting it, but you're more than able to try yourself.