Active Topics
-
How many of you still use N900 as main phone? (595)
to Community by deutch1976 - 3 days, 15 hrs ago -
Big news (7)
to OS2008 / Maemo 4 / Chinook - Diablo by endsormeans - 4 days, 23 hrs ago -
Firefox with Leste (8)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by endsormeans - 5 days ago - more...
|
2011-12-03
, 11:51
|
|
Posts: 356 |
Thanked: 69 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Poland
|
#2772
|
Originally Posted by carbonjha
ok, does it important where, in which line, should I put those two lines?
@All
qtlockscreen users can test this
add this line in /opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_sleep
this will increase the priority of qtlockscreen when usingCode:renice -1 `pgrep qtlockscreen`
and in /opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_normal
this will decrease the priority of qtlockscreen when screen is unlockedCode:renice 19 `pgrep qtlockscreen`
|
|
2011-12-03
, 19:35
|
|
Posts: 336 |
Thanked: 129 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ portugal
|
#2773
|
its oficial...witn kp49 and dsp profile..if i install batterypatch i spend more battery..as for speespatch..same old xtem message??..i am uninstalling this..thks a lot karam for all your amazing work..you changed my n900 life..but this time you were outnumbered.
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ed_boner For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-12-03
, 21:27
|
|
Posts: 22 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ India
|
#2774
|
Hi,
After installing new battery patch, my phone goes in reboot loop. I am using KP42.
I restored via Backupmenu and BatteryPatch.v2 is working fine.
Last edited by AKEEL; 2011-12-03 at 21:37.
After installing new battery patch, my phone goes in reboot loop. I am using KP42.
I restored via Backupmenu and BatteryPatch.v2 is working fine.
Last edited by AKEEL; 2011-12-03 at 21:37.
|
|
2011-12-04
, 04:08
|
|
Posts: 856 |
Thanked: 1,681 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Aleppo ,Syria
|
#2775
|
@carboniha
/opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_normal
because it takes up more battery on continues usage and it doesn't increase the performance
but about qtlockscreen
as for me i don't use it
but i will create a new package called : batterypatch-testing
including all the unfinished tests and when something is confirmed
i'm going to move it batterypatch (the stable current one)
@AKEEL
do you have unstable N900 ? when activating smartrelfex ?
this is strange
@ed_boner
that's your opinion and i respect it but :
less battery with batterypatch?
more battery with batterypatch?
less performance with speedpatch?
more performance with speedpatch?
the xterm message stays up your tail?
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
dsp profiles is just like overclock profile except the voltages (overclock has the stock ones) to prevent reboots
although smartreflex has it's own voltages which apply them on the cpu (so probably the voltages in overclock are ignored ?)
but with batterypatch :
vfs trick ... gives a lot of extra standby renice ... the same
and conversative mode in overclock gives a longer continues usage time
forgive me if i miss understand you but i made my point clear
@All
sorry for taking long to update the 1st post
this should be done soon
Last edited by karam; 2011-12-04 at 04:10.
Originally Posted by carbonjha
i don't think it's important to do renice 0 in
@karam
thanks a lot for the update
I think it is important to renice the processes of cpu_sleep back to 0 in cpu_normal
otherwise their nice value will always remain 1 & the processes will be ignored during cpu load
/opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_normal
@AllCode:renice 0 `pgrep modest` renice 0 `pgrep browserd` renice 0 `pgrep image-viewer`
qtlockscreen users can test this
add this line in /opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_sleep
this will increase the priority of qtlockscreen when usingCode:renice -1 `pgrep qtlockscreen`
and in /opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_normal
this will decrease the priority of qtlockscreen when screen is unlockedCode:renice 19 `pgrep qtlockscreen`
/opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_normal
because it takes up more battery on continues usage and it doesn't increase the performance
but about qtlockscreen
as for me i don't use it
but i will create a new package called : batterypatch-testing
including all the unfinished tests and when something is confirmed
i'm going to move it batterypatch (the stable current one)
@AKEEL
do you have unstable N900 ? when activating smartrelfex ?
this is strange
@ed_boner
that's your opinion and i respect it but :
Originally Posted by ed_boner
i was using kp49 with no patch only dsp profile and was really happy with it...last night i installed this patches..i do not have any monitoring tool but my n900 imediately seemed faster...as for the battery i believe it is much worse than without batterypatch and dsp profile..is this possible?
Originally Posted by ed_boner
comparing the above 2 posts i can't seem to understand what is exactly is your problem ?
its oficial...witn kp49 and dsp profile..if i install batterypatch i spend more battery..as for speespatch..same old xtem message??..i am uninstalling this..thks a lot karam for all your amazing work..you changed my n900 life..but this time you were outnumbered.
less battery with batterypatch?
more battery with batterypatch?
less performance with speedpatch?
more performance with speedpatch?
the xterm message stays up your tail?
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
dsp profiles is just like overclock profile except the voltages (overclock has the stock ones) to prevent reboots
although smartreflex has it's own voltages which apply them on the cpu (so probably the voltages in overclock are ignored ?)
but with batterypatch :
vfs trick ... gives a lot of extra standby renice ... the same
and conversative mode in overclock gives a longer continues usage time
forgive me if i miss understand you but i made my point clear
@All
sorry for taking long to update the 1st post
this should be done soon
__________________
My Projects:
Speed Patch & Battery patch
Task-Swapper
Wifi-Pwner (MDK3 GUI)
Hacking Tools
Tutorials
How To Increase Camera Image Quality
How To Unblock Repositories In Forbidden Countries [Like Mine]
My Projects:
Speed Patch & Battery patch
Task-Swapper
Wifi-Pwner (MDK3 GUI)
Hacking Tools
Tutorials
How To Increase Camera Image Quality
How To Unblock Repositories In Forbidden Countries [Like Mine]
Last edited by karam; 2011-12-04 at 04:10.
|
|
2011-12-04
, 05:56
|
|
Posts: 22 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ India
|
#2776
|
Originally Posted by karam
Yes, Its shows desktop and reboot itself. Previous BatteryPatch v2 is working fine.
do you have unstable N900 ? when activating smartrelfex ?
this is strange
SmartReflex is active. VDD1=0, VDD2=1.
Is it bcoz of old KP version?
I am using KP42, bcoz my bluetooth headset Nokia BH-214 is working stable only with KP42.
|
|
2011-12-04
, 11:27
|
|
Posts: 856 |
Thanked: 1,681 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Aleppo ,Syria
|
#2777
|
yes this is one of the reasons
but the latest version detects the kernel-power version installed
and installs the patch according to it
======== if you are using KP42-46-47-48 batterypatch should activate vdd1=1 and vdd2=1 but the MAXfreq is 750 (stable with vdd1)
maybe your N900 is not even stable with 750
solutions :
1-) install the latest KPv49 (maybe will solve your problem or maybe not) and then update to the latest batterypatch
2-) if you have v2 installed (the older one)
then :
PS: it's safe to uninstall it from HAM too
this will let you have an updated batterypatch features without VDD1 enabled
.........
it could've been easier with editing overclock profile only
but as you said that you have a reboot loop
then those are the only solutions
Last edited by karam; 2011-12-04 at 11:29.
but the latest version detects the kernel-power version installed
and installs the patch according to it
======== if you are using KP42-46-47-48 batterypatch should activate vdd1=1 and vdd2=1 but the MAXfreq is 750 (stable with vdd1)
maybe your N900 is not even stable with 750
solutions :
1-) install the latest KPv49 (maybe will solve your problem or maybe not) and then update to the latest batterypatch
2-) if you have v2 installed (the older one)
then :
Code:
sudo gainroot mkdir temp cd temp apt-get install -d batterypatch # press y after that and make sure you did apt-get update before with devel-enabled mv /var/cache/apt/archives/batterypatch* ./batterypatch dpkg -x batterypatch ./ rm -r /opt/dbus-scripts mv dbus-scripts /opt chmod -R +rwx /opt/dbus-scripts mv etc/dbus-scripts.d/* /etc/dbus-scripts.d/ cd .. rm -r temp
this will let you have an updated batterypatch features without VDD1 enabled
.........
it could've been easier with editing overclock profile only
but as you said that you have a reboot loop
then those are the only solutions
__________________
My Projects:
Speed Patch & Battery patch
Task-Swapper
Wifi-Pwner (MDK3 GUI)
Hacking Tools
Tutorials
How To Increase Camera Image Quality
How To Unblock Repositories In Forbidden Countries [Like Mine]
My Projects:
Speed Patch & Battery patch
Task-Swapper
Wifi-Pwner (MDK3 GUI)
Hacking Tools
Tutorials
How To Increase Camera Image Quality
How To Unblock Repositories In Forbidden Countries [Like Mine]
Last edited by karam; 2011-12-04 at 11:29.
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to karam For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2011-12-04
, 12:24
|
|
Posts: 548 |
Thanked: 562 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
@ Germany
|
#2778
|
What is the actual max. frequence with batterypatch? I'm using speedpatch, kernel-power v49 and 720p rec/watch.
@karam: It would be great if u update the first post with the supported/max frequencies.
Last edited by willi6868; 2011-12-04 at 12:27.
@karam: It would be great if u update the first post with the supported/max frequencies.
Last edited by willi6868; 2011-12-04 at 12:27.
|
|
2011-12-04
, 12:31
|
|
Posts: 336 |
Thanked: 129 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ portugal
|
#2779
|
tks for answering karam..maybe my english is not the best..the twoquoted statements say the same thing for me..with speedpatch the phone seems faster but i am kind of disapointed abot the xterm message and about batterypatch..well in my experience for now,although i understand your theory, dlesnt work for me as i could confirm it drains mmore battery...hope you dont take this the wrong way as you are one of my n900 heroes..hope you continue to work and improve and in a near future prove me wrong.
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ed_boner For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-12-04
, 16:17
|
|
Posts: 6 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Oct 2010
|
#2780
|
I will not find in this theme of a command how again to activate all configs cpu_sleep and cpu_normal. I them пересобрал itself a little and here after reboot they probably won't earn, updated QCUFreq, but the new version didn't show temperature as I am necessary also was rolled away back and have stuck save and and there is empty still, now works but I can it have made cancellation of options. Also I remember here commands were. For returning of 2 parameters and configuration automatic loading
Last edited by GomerS; 2011-12-04 at 16:20.
Last edited by GomerS; 2011-12-04 at 16:20.
 |
| Tags |
| autobrick, awesome-script, do no install, f***epitaph, install it now, perfect_ n900, script-a-brick, very safe |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:40.
so sorry guys!!
kernel-power v52
N900 rocks
http://n900world.blogspot.com/