Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
BrentDC's Avatar
Posts: 903 | Thanked: 632 times | Joined on Apr 2008
#51
Originally Posted by fatalsaint View Post
While I agree with most of what you say.. I don't think most of us are truly arguing about a "little" slang.

It's when practically the entire post is in said slang, makes little sense, and is void of content.

But I do agree that I don't see any form of automated system able to weed this out.
Yeah, I know about completely incomprehensible rubbish. Usually I just skip right over it.

One time I was conversing with someone in a forum (not this one) and their english was so bad I just assumed that they were not a native English speaker and had been using Google Translate or similar.

I could barely understand a word of what they were saying: broken sentences, unrelated tangents, etc. -- it was like they were writing down exactly what was popping into their head.

I should have figured they were from the good ol' US of A.
__________________
-Brent

Author of TouchSearch -- web searching software for Maemo 5.

Mobile Device lineage: Palm Z22 -> Palm TX -> Nokia N800 -> Nokia N900
 
Posts: 3,428 | Thanked: 2,856 times | Joined on Jul 2008
#52
Originally Posted by smarsh View Post
Bear in mind that all cultures, even, and perhaps especially, professional cultures, invent languages for themselves. We all need to feel special.
Absolute.. technology is a huge one. RAM, CPU.. Linux has "root", "shell", "terminal" - anywhere else terminal is likely to mean you're dead .

But, and as we both agree, when most of us here that talk like that realize who we are talking to doesn't understand.. we rephrase it in normal english.

The internet slang folk and people that are so addicted to short hand that everything they type just absolutely must include it everywhere... don't bother fixing their nonsense. So, as I said before - I just refuse to acknowledge them .

If I need a super-secret decoder ring to try and understand your problem.. it's not worth my time . (I guess I'm somewhat of an elitist in that fashion.)

But, as I said - This would require an AI more powerful than anybody, I believe, on here would even care to try and attempt to write in order to filter that kind of thing out. Unfortunately, there is no easy solution that I see to the signal-to-noise ratio that doesn't include a completely draconian rule (which I believe most of us are against).
__________________
If I've helped you or you use any of my packages feel free to help me out.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maintaining:
pyRadio - Pandora Radio on your N900, N810 or N800!
 
ndi's Avatar
Posts: 2,050 | Thanked: 1,425 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Bucharest
#53
Originally Posted by smarsh View Post
You have identified that invariably these posts have some grammatical or spelling problems. Therefore, you have deduced that bad grammar (or whatever) equates to lack of content or trollish posts. Therefore, spotting bad grammar (or whatever) will reduce the number of these posts.

Is it only me that sees the fallacy here?
Nope.

Also, it's hard replying to posts when people reply before your reply replies to their reply.

The idea was started as we hate lolz, and has since moved to the _fact_ that _most_ lulz-ridden, bad grammar, obvious idiot post is also devoid of content and while it's hard to draw a line on usefulness, a line could be drawn in such side effects of stupidity.

As a result we could, in theory, clean up both grammar and lack of content if we could only regulate one.

Additionally, there is still on the table the idea that it could be a positive thing more (or only) than a negative thing if the elders took it upon themselves to have high points in eloquence and grammar. (by example)

Such a system is not far in the thanking system, though it is being examined I understand. Trolly people have low ratio - however what is bad about it is that people who come here for help ask questions and get no thanks, mislabeling them even though they are here for a reason.

Lastly, my point to the fallacy as not the one I was looking for, and gave up too soon. What I wanted was the Nirvana fallacy, that states that just because a solution doesn't cover all angles it's not worth implementing.

I believe that even if there are bad sides to a system, it would still be nice to have. Some effects can be mitigated.

Thanks is bad for non-experts because they don't help. Voting is bad because people vote the idea not the application. Thanks is bad because people thank announcements. They all have major drawbacks. They they work and are actually not that bad. Especially as they are subject to refinement. Exclusion, for example.
__________________
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.

Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
 
smarsh's Avatar
Posts: 155 | Thanked: 118 times | Joined on Jan 2008 @ Ontario, Canada
#54
Originally Posted by ndi View Post
Nope.

Also, it's hard replying to posts when people reply before your reply replies to their reply.
lol

oops.

Your point regarding Nirvana is well made. I think fatalsaint is right though - getting to even an acceptable automated level would be very difficult, and the best measure is eyeballs and feet.

Still, you are quite right that leading by example would be most welcome. Glad I'm not a forum leader then.
__________________
broken pencil
 
fpp's Avatar
Posts: 2,853 | Thanked: 968 times | Joined on Nov 2005
#55
Ah, a chance to improve my grammar :-)

Originally Posted by RevdKathy View Post
Is it me or does the worst spelling and grammar come from native speakers?
Kathy, back on the first page you corrected ndi's post as above. Is that really "does", when the subject is plural ?

My instinct screams "do", but maybe that's just my French DNA playing tricks on me :-)

What a fun thread, anyway...


edit: oops, almost forgot: LOL!!!
__________________
maemo blog

Last edited by fpp; 2010-01-22 at 17:33.
 
ndi's Avatar
Posts: 2,050 | Thanked: 1,425 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Bucharest
#56
Originally Posted by fatalsaint View Post
If I need a super-secret decoder ring to try and understand your problem.. it's not worth my time . (I guess I'm somewhat of an elitist in that fashion.)
Aaaah, there it is. I was looking for that.

See, if you think that you need a decoder and pass, then next person comes by and thinks this is a pass too, and so on, would it be so hard to push a button on each pass, like "I gave up" so that the next 250 people who see the thread are spared?

Sort of like the "This is spam" system. If 50 people marked a message as spam, it's pulled. Not deleted, but moved to a little folder nobody goes to and smells bad.

Perhaps a weighed minus, from post count or something so several accounts can't bury a post. Say, -1 for each 1000 posts or so, going logarithmic so Texrat can't insta-bury people unwillingly. Maybe a manual table taking the average into account, say 100, 300, 500, 1000, 3000, Texrat.

I'm just brainstorming here.
__________________
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.

Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
 
Posts: 388 | Thanked: 842 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Finland
#57
Originally Posted by fatalsaint View Post
This would require an AI more powerful than anybody, I believe, on here would even care to try and attempt to write
Already did, but I'm unable to make it target the TMO forums. It seems to be obsessed with wiping out all humanity instead.
 
smarsh's Avatar
Posts: 155 | Thanked: 118 times | Joined on Jan 2008 @ Ontario, Canada
#58
Originally Posted by ndi View Post
Aaaah, there it is. I was looking for that.

See, if you think that you need a decoder and pass, then next person comes by and thinks this is a pass too, and so on, would it be so hard to push a button on each pass, like "I gave up" so that the next 250 people who see the thread are spared?

Sort of like the "This is spam" system. If 50 people marked a message as spam, it's pulled. Not deleted, but moved to a little folder nobody goes to and smells bad.

Perhaps a weighed minus, from post count or something so several accounts can't bury a post. Say, -1 for each 1000 posts or so, going logarithmic so Texrat can't insta-bury people unwillingly. Maybe a manual table taking the average into account, say 100, 300, 500, 1000, 3000, Texrat.

I'm just brainstorming here.
I tried a similar idea as 'no thanks' once: http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=33168

Which led to some interesting discussion.

Is this the kind of thing you were thinking about?
 
Posts: 3,428 | Thanked: 2,856 times | Joined on Jul 2008
#59
Originally Posted by ndi View Post
Perhaps a weighed minus, from post count or something so several accounts can't bury a post. Say, -1 for each 1000 posts or so, going logarithmic so Texrat can't insta-bury people unwillingly. Maybe a manual table taking the average into account, say 100, 300, 500, 1000, 3000, Texrat.
Hey!!!! I get to self-promote!!!! WOOHOO .

http://maemo.org/community/brainstor...sign_for_2010/

Please see solution #11 .
__________________
If I've helped you or you use any of my packages feel free to help me out.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maintaining:
pyRadio - Pandora Radio on your N900, N810 or N800!
 
Posts: 2,829 | Thanked: 1,459 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Finland
#60
Originally Posted by ndi View Post
....
However, I agree, lazy writing. And for the love of... please someone pin a sticky explaining the difference between N900s and N900's....
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/apostrophe
:P

For me difference is that for second one I have to use fn key and thats annoying.
 
Reply

Tags
back to school vs, back to the woods, community, expert system, grammar, improvement, lol, me talk pretty one day, spelling


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:04.