Whatsup - Harmattan client [UPDATED 29-03-2016] - Page 6 - maemo.org

Active Topics

Is there a section to talk about Java ME? Apps, etc. (0)
to General by Kalatti - 2 days, 3 hrs ago
Extra softwares in Sailfish using CLI, repositories, etc (117)
to SailfishOS by nieldk - 4 days ago
Firefox with Leste (6)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 4 days, 21 hrs ago
more...

Page 6 of 135

Thread Tools

	CepiPerez	2014-11-10 , 14:53
	Posts: 1,023 \| Thanked: 4,421 times \| Joined on Feb 2010 @ Argentina	#51

Originally Posted by youFailed

You changed the share function on 1.0.3 from old 1.0.2. You get bored how many buttons you need to press, idk why you did that.
1.0.3 = you press share, you press add, you select contact, you press back, you press send, you press back again to go to message list, you select contact to continue chating with that person.

1.0.2 = you press share, you are redirected direct to contact list, you select contact , you are redirected direct to message with message sent to continue chatting with that person.

You see the difference?

Bug: Media gallery is working on settings but on contact profile , the list of files you sent /received dosent work anymore like in 1.0.2.

Bug2: images are sent in another position, with face down, left, right.

bug3: adds contacts that you deleted. not sure but 2 times happend.

That's because you can share with more than one person now. If you want to share something to one person only, then use the conversation send media function. It's faster than use share function.

__________________
Filebox / FileCase for Maemo / Harmattan / Sailfish
FlowPlayer for Maemo / Harmattan / Sailfish
Whatsup for Harmattan / Sailfish
CallBlocker for Harmattan

Support my work:
Paypal / Bitcoin

Quote & Reply |

	CepiPerez	2014-11-10 , 14:56
	Posts: 1,023 \| Thanked: 4,421 times \| Joined on Feb 2010 @ Argentina	#52

Originally Posted by karthick

the whatsup version 0.3.4b works perfecting well in all ways and is stable the oly prob with it is we canot set prof pic..tats all
the new version of whatsup 1.0.0 is not good

We are in 1.0.3 now, and you will get 1.0.4 this week with more fixes and the new stupid "read" function included.

Quote & Reply |

The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to CepiPerez For This Useful Post:
Blacksphere, DieHard, eekkelund, HtheB, Jordi, Lucazz990, minimos, padmaraj.ravi, pistachio, praveenchand, sada11, saifo, sid21177, Timpaxi, youFailed

youFailed	2014-11-10 , 16:55
Posts: 92 \| Thanked: 39 times \| Joined on Jan 2014	#53

Originally Posted by CepiPerez

That's because you can share with more than one person now. If you want to share something to one person only, then use the conversation send media function. It's faster than use share function.

i know this but is not a viable solution if you have many pictures that look almost the same/made in same place but different positions/same colour/etc , you always need to enter gallery and remember the name of exactly picture you wanna send because in conversation send media function you cant see fullscreen of picture/ preview picture.

Anyway i said this because i think was more practical default share options to be only for one person like in 1.0.2 was and add another option in settings to be like in 1.0.3 for more than 1 person or one option in settings to change the share style, for 1 person or for more.

These are only suggestions, i dont say how to do your job. Peace.

Waiting for 1.0.4 version.

Quote & Reply |

	CepiPerez	2014-11-10 , 18:42
	Posts: 1,023 \| Thanked: 4,421 times \| Joined on Feb 2010 @ Argentina	#54

Originally Posted by youFailed

i know this but is not a viable solution if you have many pictures that look almost the same/made in same place but different positions/same colour/etc , you always need to enter gallery and remember the name of exactly picture you wanna send because in conversation send media function you cant see fullscreen of picture/ preview picture.

Anyway i said this because i think was more practical default share options to be only for one person like in 1.0.2 was and add another option in settings to be like in 1.0.3 for more than 1 person or one option in settings to change the share style, for 1 person or for more.

These are only suggestions, i dont say how to do your job. Peace.
Waiting for 1.0.4 version.

For this case, maybe adding a preview using long press can be a better solution. What do you think?

Quote & Reply |

The Following User Says Thank You to CepiPerez For This Useful Post:
youFailed

Loginin	2014-11-10 , 19:49
Posts: 56 \| Thanked: 13 times \| Joined on Mar 2012 @ Novosibirsk, Russia	#55

Originally Posted by coderus

@pishta74 integrate in messaging and loose group chats, broadcasts and many other nice features? No, thanks

Just out of curiosity: messaging does support group chats (e.g. in skype), why they won't work with whatsup?

Quote & Reply |

	coderus	2014-11-10 , 19:56
	Posts: 6,436 \| Thanked: 12,699 times \| Joined on Nov 2011 @ Ängelholm, Sweden	#56

@Loginin just check features messaging app provide and whatsapp client have. Have any questions?

__________________
Telegram | Openrepos | GitHub | Revolut donations

Quote & Reply |

sid21177	2014-11-10 , 20:09
Posts: 109 \| Thanked: 59 times \| Joined on Apr 2012	#57

long press on group picture in a group details no longer opens the large preview (size like the picture size on view profile details for a contact)

Quote & Reply |

Loginin	2014-11-11 , 05:24
Posts: 56 \| Thanked: 13 times \| Joined on Mar 2012 @ Novosibirsk, Russia	#58

Originally Posted by coderus

@Loginin just check features messaging app provide and whatsapp client have. Have any questions?

I understand that Whatsapp is richer in features. The real question is what maximal set of features messaging app internally supports. The set of features in messaging varies significantly from service to service, so it is not obvious what is possible and what is not (some services support attachments, some not, etc.) You as an author of extaplugins most probably know this and that is why I asked.

Last edited by Loginin; 2014-11-11 at 05:29.

Quote & Reply |

youFailed	2014-11-11 , 07:05
Posts: 92 \| Thanked: 39 times \| Joined on Jan 2014	#59

Originally Posted by CepiPerez

For this case, maybe adding a preview using long press can be a better solution. What do you think?

that will be a great feature if dosent cause any conflict . i say is the best option and practical .

Quote & Reply |

	coderus	2014-11-11 , 10:03
	Posts: 6,436 \| Thanked: 12,699 times \| Joined on Nov 2011 @ Ängelholm, Sweden	#60

@Loginin in that case nobody is interesting in making client which can't provide all features protocol have.